Page 3
Thomas Kuhn, in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" wrote "Normal science is when, after a long period of scientific endeavour, the basic concepts of a scientific theory are not questioned."
Isaac Asimov, in his book "The Stars in their Courses" wrote "Science is the secular religion of today and the scientists, in a very literal sense, the new priesthood." One assumes that he inferred also that the Universities are the new Cathedrals and schools are the new churches.
John S. Mattich, in the Scientific American magazine of October 2004 wrote "Assumptions can be dangerous, especially in science. They usually start as the most plausible and comfortable interpretation of the available facts. When the truth cannot be immediately tested and their flaws are not obvious, assumptions often graduate into articles of faith (science being the secular religion of today) and new observations are forced to fit them."
In the book "Suppressed Inventions" edited by Jonathon Eisen, Leo Tolstoy is quoted that "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth, if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to collegues, which they have proudly taught of other, and which they have woven thread by thread into the fabric of their lives".
These four quotes go hand in hand as normal science, otherwise known as the standard model, has certain theories that are considered as 'sacred ancestral treasures' which are theories that are held in such high regard that to dispute them is equivalent to blasphemy, something of which we are to be accused. Note that all quotes are from respected science writers who would go along with the normal science of today.
The Quantum Energy Theory holds that there are only three force fields in the universe, electricity, magnetism and gravity. Normal science says that there are many more forms of force fields but these extra ones will be shown to be both unnecessary and unrealistic, being merely made up to fill some hole in the normal science theories.
They, the additional forms of energy fields, run counter to Occam's Razor that holds that theories with the smallest number of arbitrary assumptions are to be preferred and Newton's Rules of Reasoning number 2 that holds that we are to admit no more causes of natural things than such are both true and sufficient to explain their appearance and therefore to the same natural effects we must, as far as possible, assign the same cause. These two comments are to be recalled when we consider the effects of gravity.
The Electron is like a bladder, holding a quantity of the electrical force field which flows from one Electron to the next when there is a difference in quantity in the one Electron from the other and there is a means by which the electrical force field can flow between them. When the quantity in the Electron is sufficiently high, the electric force field will reach out, seeking another home holding a lower quantity, such as when lightning flows from the clouds to the earth or to another cloud. Visualize the flow of the electrical force field as from east to west or west to east from either side of the bladder type Electron. As with most of nature, the quantity of electricity in one Electron will seek out with the amount in another Electron in the same way as water flows from the wetter to the drier soil particle and heat flows from the hotter to the cooler particle, in line with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The flow of electricity we see is the electrical force field and not the movement of the Electron itself which is stable.
|
|